The Use of Prophylactic Ureteric Stents in Major Abdomino-Pelvic Sarcoma Surgery: Risks, Benefits, and Potential Complications.

Here we present two cases of post-operative obstructive renal failure following major abdomino-pelvic sarcoma surgery. In both cases, prophylactic ureteric stents were inserted to aid the identification and protection of the ureters during resection of these complex retroperitoneal masses. In case one, obstructive renal failure occurred following ureteric stent removal on day 0 post-operatively. In case two, obstructive renal failure developed on day 1 post-operatively despite having a ureteric stent in situ. Here we propose that a combination of reflex anuria/ureteric edema and papillary sloughing led to the obstructive renal failure in both cases. Re-insertion of bilateral ureteric stents in case one, and replacement of a right ureteric stent in case two saw prompt excretion of urine and sloughy debris with rapid improvement of renal function. This article presents these cases in detail and further reviews the use of prophylactic ureteric stents in major abdomino-pelvic surgery along with the current guidelines for their usage.

ASTRA - An alternative approach for the posterior urethra

ABSTRACT Introduction: Access represents one of the main challenges in performing posterior urethroplasty (1, 2). Several approaches and tactics have been previously described (3). This video demonstrates the Anterior Sagittal Transrectal Approach (ASTRA), which allows better visualization of the deep perineum (4). Materials and Methods: Our patient was a 65-year-old man with post radical prostatectomy vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis. He failed repeated endoscopic interventions, eventually developing urinary retention and requiring a cystostomy. We offered a vesicourethral anastomotic repair through ASTRA. The patient was placed in the jackknife position and methylene blue instilled through the cystostomy. To optimize access to the bladder neck, an incision of the anterior border of the rectum is performed. Anastomosis is carried out with six 4-0 PDS sutures. These are tied using a parachute technique, after insertion of a 16F Foley. Results: The patient was discharged after 72 hours, and the Foley catheter was removed after 4 weeks. There were no access-related complications. Retrograde urethrogram 3 months after surgery confirmed patency of the anastomosis. Upon review 5 months after surgery the patient had urinary incontinence requiring 5 pads/day and was considered for an artificial urinary sphincter. Discussion: In our series of 92 patients who have undergone reconstructive procedure through ASTRA there have been no cases of fecal incontinence. Two patients with prior history of radiotherapy developed rectourethral fistulas. Urinary incontinence was observed in those patients with stenosis after radical prostatectomy. Conclusion: This video presents a step-by-step description of ASTRA, an approach that provides excellent visualization to the posterior urethra, representing an alternative access for repair of complex posterior urethral stenosis.

ASTRA - An alternative approach for the posterior urethra.

INTRODUCTION: Access represents one of the main challenges in performing posterior urethroplasty (1, 2). Several approaches and tactics have been previously described (3). This video demonstrates the Anterior Sagittal Transrectal Approach (ASTRA), which allows better visualization of the deep perineum (4). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our patient was a 65-year-old man with post radical prostatectomy vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis. He failed repeated endoscopic interventions, eventually developing urinary retention and requiring a cystostomy. We offered a vesicourethral anastomotic repair through ASTRA. The patient was placed in the jackknife position and methylene blue instilled through the cystostomy. To optimize access to the bladder neck, an incision of the anterior border of the rectum is performed. Anastomosis is carried out with six 4-0 PDS sutures. These are tied using a parachute technique, after insertion of a 16F Foley. RESULTS: The patient was discharged after 72 hours, and the Foley catheter was removed after 4 weeks. There were no access-related complications. Retrograde urethrogram 3 months after surgery confirmed patency of the anastomosis. Upon review 5 months after surgery the patient had urinary incontinence requiring 5 pads/day and was considered for an artificial urinary sphincter. DISCUSSION: In our series of 92 patients who have undergone reconstructive procedure through ASTRA there have been no cases of fecal incontinence. Two patients with prior history of radiotherapy developed rectourethral fistulas. Urinary incontinence was observed in those patients with stenosis after radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSION: This video presents a step-by-step description of ASTRA, an approach that provides excellent visualization to the posterior urethra, representing an alternative access for repair of complex posterior urethral stenosis.

Endoscopic Holmium Laser harvesting of bladder mucosal graft for substitution urethroplasty

ABSTRACT Introduction: Tissue transfer has been used in urethral reconstruction for decades, and several grafts have been described (1, 2). The ideal graft would have optimal tissue characteristics and lead to minimal morbidity at the donor site. Urethroplasty using bladder mucosa was first described by Memmelaar in 1947 (3). The main limitation in using bladder mucosal grafts has been the invasiveness of open harvesting (4). We describe an endoscopic technique using Holmium: YAG laser to harvest bladder mucosal graft for substitution urethroplasty. Methodology: A 33-year-old male with no history of urethral instrumentation, trauma, or infection presented with obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms. On retrograde urethrogram a 6cm bulbar urethral stricture was identified. Several options were discussed, and the patient opted for a one-sided onlay dorsal urethroplasty (5) using a bladder mucosal graft. Equipment used to harvest the graft included an 18.5Fr continuous flow laser endoscope with a Kuntz working element (RZ) and a 60W Holmium Laser (Quanta) with 550μm laser fiber. The procedure was started by making a perineal incision, urethral mobilization and incision of the stricture segment. The laser endoscope was then introduced via the perineum. Settings of 0.5J, 30 Hz, and long pulse were used and a 7 x 2.5cm graft was harvested from the posterior bladder wall. Hemostasis of the harvest site was performed. The bladder mucosal graft was thinned in similar fashion to a buccal mucosal graft and sutured as per previously described techniques. Conclusion: Endoscopic Holmium Laser harvesting of bladder mucosal graft is feasible and may allow this graft to become an alternative to buccal mucosa. Further studies are required to define its role in urethral reconstruction.

Analysis of mortality in colorectal surgery in the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit.

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, there has been a significant increase in interest for public reporting of outcome data and performance comparison across institutions and surgeons. This study aims at comparing postoperative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery across units and individual consultants in Australia and New Zealand using funnel plots. METHODS: The Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit database was used. Unadjusted and adjusted funnel plots of inpatient mortality were constructed. Risk adjustment was based upon multivariable logistic regression models using purposeful covariate selection. RESULTS: A total of 10 008 patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer from 56 surgical units and 90 consultants were identified. Overall inpatient mortality was 1.51%, corresponding to 1.1% for elective and 3.9% for urgent cases. Logistic regression identified age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, urgent surgery and open surgery to be independently associated with inpatient mortality. Unadjusted and adjusted funnel plot analysis identified three (5.3%) units exceeding the inner limit and none exceeding the outer limit. Six (6.6%) consultants had inpatient mortality between the upper inner and outer limits and one (1.1%) between the inferior inner and outer limits. Upon adjustment, seven (7.7%) consultants had inpatient mortality between the inner and outer limit. Potential limitations of this study include: residual confounding being responsible for the association of open surgery and mortality; incomplete case-mix adjustment resulting in outlier identification; and bias towards inclusion of larger institutions. CONCLUSION: Mortality figures in Australia and New Zealand are comparable to recently reported international data. The vast majority of units and consultants are performing within the expected boundaries.

Recurrence in patients with stage I colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of patients with stage I colorectal cancer submitted to surgery with curative intent have not been thoroughly explored in contemporary series. METHODS: All patients with colon or rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent resection from the St John of God Hospital (1996-2013) and BioGrid (1991-2013) databases were identified. Patients submitted to local excision, polypectomies or neoadjuvant treatment were excluded. Outcomes included recurrence (combined local and systemic), recurrence-free and overall survival, and survival after recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 1193 patients with stage I disease were included. Median age was 67 (interquartile range 59-75) and median follow-up was 3.2 years (interquartile range 1.4-5.8). Five-year recurrence rate was 7.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.4-9.4%; 5.0% for colon and 11.1% for rectal cancer). Rectal location was an independent predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 1.97, 95% CI 1.09-3.55; P = 0.024). Lymphovascular invasion was an independent predictor of recurrence only in patients with rectal cancer (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-7.6; P = 0.018). Five-year recurrence-free survival was 83.2% (95% CI 80.3-85.4%). Age (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07; P < 0.001), elective surgery (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.80; P = 0.011) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (HR 3.08, 95% CI 1.51-6.31; P < 0.001) were independently associated with recurrence-free survival. Median survival after recurrence was 41 months. Resection of recurrence was attempted in 39% of patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with stage I colorectal cancers still have a clinically significant risk of recurrence. Rectal location is independently associated with higher recurrence. Age, elective surgery and ASA are independently associated with recurrence-free survival. A significant proportion of patients with recurrence underwent further resection.

Outcomes in patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Urgent surgery for acute intestinal presentations is generally associated with worse outcomes than elective procedures. This study assessed the outcomes of patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery. METHODS: Patients were identified from a prospective database. Surgery was classified as urgent when performed as soon as possible after resuscitation and usually within 24 h. Outcome measures included 30 days mortality, return to theatre, anastomotic leak and overall survival. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-nine patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range 48-74). The most common presentations were obstruction (52.2%) and perforation (23.6%). Cancer was the disease process responsible for presentation in 47.8% of patients. Thirty-day mortality was 6.8%. Age (odds ratio 1.08 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.15; P = 0.01), American Society of Anesthesiologists 4 (odds ratio 7.14 95% CI 1.67-30.4; P = 0.008) and cancer (odds ratio 6.61 95% CI 1.53-28.45; P = 0.011) were independent predictors of 30 days mortality. Relaparotomy was required in six (2.4%) cases. A primary anastomosis was performed in 156 (62.6%) patients. Anastomotic leak occurred in four (2.5%) patients. In patients with cancer, overall 5-year survival was 28% (95% CI 19-37), corresponding to 54% (95% CI 35-70) for stages I and II, 50% (95% CI 24-71) for stage III and 6% (95% CI 1-17) for stage IV disease. Urgent surgery was independently associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio 2.65; 95% CI 1.76-3.99; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing an urgent resection within a colorectal unit, performing a primary anastomosis is feasible and safe in the majority, relaparotomies are required in a minority and urgent surgery is an important predictor of worse prognosis in those with colorectal cancer.

Avaliação pré-operatória: triagem por meio de questionário / Preoperative evaluation: screening using a questionnaire / Evaluación preoperatoria: selección por medio de cuestionario

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Antes de cirurgia eletiva é indispensável conhecer com antecedência as condições clínicas do paciente. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a avaliação pré-operatória (APO) por meio do preenchimento de um questionário com a consulta realizada pelo anestesiologista. MÉTODO: Antes da consulta pré-operatória, os pacientes responderam a um questionário com informações sobre idade, peso, altura, cirurgia planejada, história médica e cirúrgica pregressa, alergias, medicamentos e doses usadas, história social (drogas ilícitas, álcool, tabagismo), capacidade funcional e tolerância ao exercício. A consulta pré-operatória foi realizada por anestesiologista que não tinha acesso aos dados do questionário nem conhecimento da pesquisa. Os dados obtidos por meio do questionário foram comparados com a consulta pré-operatória por dois pesquisadores independentes, com a finalidade de responder às perguntas: 1) A avaliação pelo questionário foi suficiente - o paciente poderia ser conduzido à cirurgia sem necessidade da avaliação presencial? 2) Houve alguma informação relevante - capaz de mudar a conduta anestésica - que o questionário não aferiu, mas que a consulta presencial avaliou? 3) Houve alguma informação acrescentada pelo questionário de saúde que a consulta presencial não obteve? Para análise estatística usou-se o teste t de Student pareado para dados paramétricos e o teste Qui-quadrado para dados categóricos com P < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Dentre os 269 pacientes elegíveis houve uma recusa, quatro aceitaram participar mas não preencheram o questionário e houve 52 perdas, totalizando 212 participantes. O questionário acrescentou dados à consulta em 109 casos (51,4%). A triagem apenas pelo questionário foi suficiente - não necessitou de consulta presencial - em 144 pacientes (67,93%). A avaliação realizada pelo anestesiologista liberou para a cirurgia na primeira consulta em 178 oportunidades (84%). Na identificação dos casos de não liberação para cirurgia, o questionário apresentou valor preditivo negativo de 94,4%, valor preditivo positivo de 38,2%, sensibilidade de 76,5% e especificidade de 76,4%. Houve fatores clínicos estatisticamente significativos (P < 0,05) associados com não liberação para a cirurgia: idade acima de 65 anos, IMC > 30, baixa capacidade funcional, hipertensão arterial, diabetes mellitus, asma, insuficiência renal, hepatite e cardiopatia isquêmica. CONCLUSÕES: O uso do questionário foi efetivo para triagem de pacientes que necessitam de avaliação complementar e/ou alteração de regime terapêutico previamente ao procedimento eletivo. Além disso, o questionário acrescentou dados não contemplados pela avaliação clínica.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prior to elective surgery it is essential to know in advance the patient’s clinical condition. The aim of this study was to compare the preoperative evaluation (POE) through questionnaire responses with preanesthetic evaluation by the anesthesiologist. METHOD: Prior to their preoperative evaluation, patients answered a questionnaire with information regarding age, weight, height, scheduled surgery, past medical and surgical history, allergies, medications and doses used, social history (illicit drugs, alcohol, smoking), functional capacity and exercise tolerance. Preoperative evaluation was performed by an anesthesiologist who had no access to the questionnaire data or knowledge about the research. The questionnaire data were compared with the preoperative evaluation by two independent investigators, in order to answer the questions: 1) Was the questionnaire evaluation effective - could the patient undergo surgery without the need for face-to-face consultation? 2) Has been there any relevant information - ability to change the anesthetic approach - not assessed by the questionnaire, but assessed by the face-to-face consultation? 3) Has been there any information added by the health questionnaire that was missed by face-to-face consultation? For statistical analysis, the paired Student’s t-test was used for parametric data and chi-square test for categorical data, with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 269 eligible patients there was one refusal, and four agreed to participate but did not complete the questionnaire, in addition to 52 losses, totaling 212 participants. Questionnaire data added to the consultation in 109 cases (51.4%). The screening questionnaire alone was effective for 144 patients (67.93%), with no need for consultation. The anesthesiologist evaluation referred patients for surgery on their first visit in 178 opportunities (84%). In the identification of cases of non-referral to surgery, the questionnaire showed a negative predictive value of 94.4%, positive predictive value of 38.2%, sensitivity of 76.5%, and specificity of 76.4%. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) clinical factors associated with non-referral to surgery were: age over 65 years, BMI > 30, low functional capacity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, asthma, renal failure, hepatitis, and ischemic heart disease. CONCLUSION: The questionnaire was effective for screening patients who needed further evaluation and/or changes in treatment regimen prior to elective surgery. Moreover, the questionnaire added data not covered by clinical evaluation.

JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: Antes de iniciar la cirugía electiva se hace indispensable conocer con anterioridad las condiciones clínicas del paciente. El objetivo de este estudio, fue comparar la evaluación preoperatoria (EPO) por medio de la realización de un cuestionario con la consulta realizada por el anestesiólogo. MÉTODO: Antes de la consulta preoperatoria, los pacientes respondieron a un cuestionario con informaciones sobre edad, peso, altura, cirugía planificada, historial médico y quirúrgico anterior, alergias, medicamentos y dosis usadas, historial social (drogas ilícitas, alcohol, tabaquismo), capacidad funcional y tolerancia al ejercicio. La consulta preoperatoria fue realizada por un anestesiólogo que no tenía acceso a los datos del cuestionario ni sabía nada sobre la investigación. Los datos obtenidos por medio del cuestionario se compararon con la consulta preoperatoria por dos investigadores independientes, con la finalidad de responder a las preguntas: 1) ¿La evaluación por el cuestionario fue suficiente y el paciente podría haber sido derivado a la cirugía sin necesidad de la evaluación presencial? 2) ¿Hubo alguna información relevante capaz de cambiar la conducta anestésica que el cuestionario no comprobó, pero que fue tenido en cuenta por la consulta presencial? 3) ¿Hubo alguna información añadida por el cuestionario de salud que la consulta presencial no obtuvo? Para el análisis estadístico se usó el test t de Student pareado para los datos paramétricos, y el test X² para los datos categóricos con P < 0,05. RESULTADOS: De los 269 pacientes elegidos, se produjo una negativa, cuatro aceptaron participar pero no rellenaron el cuestionario, y hubo 52 pérdidas, totalizando 212 participantes. El cuestionario añadió datos a la consulta en 109 casos (51,4%). La selección hecha por el cuestionario fue suficiente y no necesitó consulta presencial en 144 pacientes (67,93%). La evaluación realizada por el anestesiólogo autorizó ya para operación en la primera consulta en 178 oportunidades (84%). En la identificación de los casos de no autorización para la cirugía, el cuestionario tuvo un valor predictivo negativo de un 94,4%, valor predictivo positivo de un 38,2%, sensibilidad del 76,5% y una especificidad de un 76,4%. Hubo factores clínicos estadísticamente significativos (P < 0,05), asociados con la no autorización para la cirugía: edad por encima de los 65 años, IMC > 30, baja capacidad funcional, hipertensión arterial, diabetes mellitus, asma, insuficiencia renal, hepatitis y cardiopatía isquémica. CONCLUSIONES: El uso del cuestionario fue efectivo para la selección de pacientes que necesitan una evaluación complementaria y/o alteración de régimen terapéutico anteriormente al procedimiento electivo. Además, el cuestionario añadió datos no contemplados por la evaluación tradicional.

Non-lethal? Penetrating chest injury due to beanbag bullet.

We report a case of serious lung injury from beanbag bullet. A 46-year-old gentleman, shot with beanbag bullets was brought to the emergency department. Upon arrival he was in obvious respiratory distress and complained of severe pain in the right chest. A 3.0×3.5 cm entry wound on the right parasternal area was identified. Chest x-ray revealed a right haemopneumothorax, parenchymal changes at the right lung base and a radiopaque foreign body. A right-sided intercostal chest tube was inserted, draining air and 750 ml of blood. After stabilisation patient underwent a right thoracotomy. A beanbag bullet was found in the oblique fissure of the right lung, with extensive haematoma of the middle lobe. The bullet and skin fragments overlying the lung and along the bullet track were extracted. The pleural cavity was washed with normal saline and haemostasis was confirmed. The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery.

The effects of N-acetylcysteine on spermatogenesis and degree of testicular germ cell apoptosis in an experimental model of varicocele in rats.

INTRODUCTION: The mechanism by which varicocele interferes in spermatogenesis has not been clearly defined. Germ cell apoptosis and oxidative stress appear to be involved in this process and the use of antioxidants has been proposed to counteract upon these effects. The present study evaluated the effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on spermatogenesis and germ cell apoptosis in an experimental model of varicocele in rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty 30-day-old animals were randomly divided into three groups: sham operation (Group 1), left experimental varicocele (Group 2) and left experimental varicocele group treated with NAC 50 mg/kg/day (Group 3). After 2 months, spermatogenesis was evaluated by absolute and true count of round spermatids, pachytenes, spermatocytes and Sertoli cells. The different cell relations were also analyzed. Germ cell apoptosis was quantified using the TUNEL method. The apoptotic index (AI) was calculated as the number of apoptotic cells per tubule. Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance considering P < 0.05. RESULTS: The absolute and true cell counts were similar among the groups (P > 0.05). The round spermatid/pachytene ratio was significantly smaller in Groups 2 and 3 compared to the Group 1 (P = 0.012). The AI values were 0.207 ± 0.09, 0.138 ± 0.11 and 0.298 ± 0.27, respectively (P = 0.256). CONCLUSION: Experimental varicocele in rats presented an association with the decreased round spermatid/pachytene ratio, suggesting the loss of germ cells during spermatogenesis. These effects were not influenced by the administration of NAC. Germ cell apoptosis was not influenced by experimental varicocele.

Health and quality of life in urology: issues in general urology and urological oncology.

OBJECTIVES: Frequently, the term "quality of life" has been used to justify personal and professional decisions in all fields of medicine. Nowadays, quality of life studies are based on development and validation of sensitive measures of patient outcomes, incorporating functional status and perceived health status. Thus, quality of life has become an outcome as important as survival and effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic review using Pubmed and Medline was performed, searching for papers concerning health related quality of life and urology. The most relevant articles where questionnaires and interviews were described and validated were listed. RESULTS: Based on psychometric properties, a search between 1970 and 2007 identified a total of 25 recommendable articles with generic inventories and specific modules that have been developed, validated and used in clinical practice or research. Historical aspects, quality of life concepts, validation of questionnaires and structured interviews, and most used instruments in generic health-related quality of life, general urology and urological oncology have been discussed. CONCLUSIONS: A brief review of historic background of health related quality of life and urology was performed.